It's spelled "its" when it's possessive, "it's" always means "it is". Weird quirk of English. "It" is the only word where the possessive form ending in 's doesn't have an apostrophe.
OpenAI under Sam is maybe one of the most ultimately dangerous things I can imagine. Maybe not now. Maybe not overtly ever. But the precedent they're setting for privacy and legal standards is nowhere to be found. Shady sh*t is going on. And it all points back to him. He should be held liable for everything including the murders pointing back to the company
Seems like a key reason he'd reject Musk's offer is that he (as leader of nonprofit OpenAI) doesn't think it's in humanity's best interests to sell it to Musk. But he does think that selling it to the current OpenAI leadership is good, because of course he does! That seems pretty reasonable and internally consistent to me.
It's spelled "its" when it's possessive, "it's" always means "it is". Weird quirk of English. "It" is the only word where the possessive form ending in 's doesn't have an apostrophe.
OpenAI under Sam is maybe one of the most ultimately dangerous things I can imagine. Maybe not now. Maybe not overtly ever. But the precedent they're setting for privacy and legal standards is nowhere to be found. Shady sh*t is going on. And it all points back to him. He should be held liable for everything including the murders pointing back to the company
Seems like a key reason he'd reject Musk's offer is that he (as leader of nonprofit OpenAI) doesn't think it's in humanity's best interests to sell it to Musk. But he does think that selling it to the current OpenAI leadership is good, because of course he does! That seems pretty reasonable and internally consistent to me.
I think he could to say that if so. Also I care whether the non profit is meeting its obligations, not what Mr Altman believes.